MGCB Leaves NCPG Over Kalshi Partnership

Written by: Jonathan Rodriguez
Published: Mon Jul 06, 2026, 7:00 am ET
Read Time: 4 minutes

industry
The Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) has withdrawn from the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) after the organization welcomed prediction market operator Kalshi as a Platinum Member through a $2 million strategic partnership.
The decision reflects Michigan's growing opposition to sports event contracts that regulators classify as unauthorized gambling.
The move also highlights the widening divide between state regulators and prediction market operators. While Kalshi maintains that its products fall under federal commodities regulation, Michigan continues to argue that the contracts resemble sports betting.
As legal disputes continue nationwide, the latest development adds another chapter to the debate over the future of prediction markets and US online sportsbooks.
MGCB Leaves NCPG over Kalshi Partnership
The MGCB announced its departure after determining that the NCPG's partnership with Kalshi conflicts with Michigan's responsible gambling objectives.
Kalshi joined the organization as a Platinum Member through a $2 million strategic partnership that supports the NCPG's Financial Trader Health and Safety Initiative.
However, Michigan regulators believe the relationship sends the wrong message while Kalshi continues fighting state enforcement actions over sports event contracts.
In a letter to the organization, MGCB Executive Director Henry Williams criticized Kalshi's efforts to separate sports event contracts from traditional wagering.
"I am deeply concerned that Kalshi's attempts to distinguish sporting event contracts from other forms of sports betting by claiming that its offerings are akin to 'investment' or 'insurance' products directly undermines a foundational message of responsible gaming: that gambling in any form is for entertainment purposes only."
Williams argued that portraying sports event contracts as financial products conflicts with long-standing responsible gambling messaging.
He further stated:
"The notion that internet sports betting can and should be pursued as a viable means of financial gain or protection against financial loss undermines this position and increases the risk of irresponsible and problem gambling behavior."
According to Williams, continuing the partnership could create confusion by suggesting that sports event contracts deserve the same credibility as regulated gambling products.
MGCB's Goals Not In Sync with the NCPG Anymore
The MGCB also concluded that remaining affiliated with the NCPG no longer aligns with its statutory responsibilities.
Williams added:
"After considering this matter, I have concluded that continuing our membership in NCPG is inconsistent with the MGCB's mission, statutory responsibilities, and its commitment to responsible gaming and to protecting the public from the risks of problem gambling in Michigan."
As a result, the MGCB requested the immediate removal of its membership from the NCPG. This also includes ending employee participation in NCPG committees. The MGCB also confirmed it would no longer sponsor or attend future council events.
Meanwhile, the NCPG has defended its relationship with Kalshi. The organization said membership does not represent an endorsement of any company's products or legal position. Instead, it maintains that engaging with emerging sectors helps expand education and harm reduction efforts.
Michigan Continues Legal Battle Against Prediction Markets
The withdrawal also comes as the MGCB continues its legal campaign against prediction market operators.
Most recently, the regulator secured a temporary restraining order preventing Kalshi from offering sports event contracts to Michigan residents. The order remains in effect until July 13, when the court is scheduled to revisit the matter. Michigan argues that these contracts constitute unauthorized sports betting under state law.
Kalshi disputes that interpretation. The company maintains that it operates a federally regulated exchange overseen by the CFTC and therefore falls outside state gambling authority.
The disagreement mirrors similar legal battles unfolding across several states, where regulators continue challenging prediction market operators over sports-related contracts.
Michigan Gambling Industry Remains Among the Nation's Most Tightly Regulated
The dispute underscores the state's broader approach to Michigan gambling regulation.
Michigan has developed one of the strictest gambling regulatory frameworks in the United States. Licensed operators must comply with extensive consumer protection rules, responsible gambling requirements, and ongoing regulatory oversight.
The MGCB has consistently enforced those standards across online casinos, retail gaming, and US online sportsbooks. Regulators have also taken action against offshore operators, sweepstakes casinos, and other businesses they believe violate state law.
Against that backdrop, Michigan views prediction markets offering sports contracts as another area requiring firm regulatory enforcement. This viewpoint seeks to protect consumers and preserve the integrity of the licensed market.
As court proceedings continue, the MGCB's departure from the NCPG signals that the state intends to maintain its hardline position.
The decision also reinforces Michigan's commitment to responsible gambling principles. The Wolverine State believes they should challenge business models that their regulators believe fall outside established gaming laws.
Going forward, the outcome of Michigan's legal fight with Kalshi could influence how other states regulate prediction markets. It may also shape future partnerships between responsible gambling organizations and emerging gaming or financial technology companies.
Betting Industry News Betting Industry News Betting Industry News Betting Industry NewsMore Industry News
mBitcasino Launches Juicy Multiplier Rush Promo
North Carolina SB 257 Raises Sports Betting Tax
Kalshi Sues Illinois to Block SB 3019 Prediction Market Law
Polymarket Sues New Mexico Over Gambling Enforcement
This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only. Betting News makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information given or the outcome of any game or event.
