MN Advances Sweepstakes Casinos & Prediction Market Bans

Jonathan Rodriguez

Written by: Jonathan Rodriguez

Published: Fri Mar 27, 2026, 9:00 am ET

Read Time: 3 minutes

MN Advances Sweepstakes Casinos & Prediction Market Bans

industry

State lawmakers recently advanced SF 4474 and HF 4437 through committee hearings, but these bills belong to two distinct legislative tracks. Together, they reflect a coordinated push to eliminate unregulated wagering models.

Minnesota Committees Advance Separate Tracks for SF 4474 and HF 4437

On one track, legislators are targeting sweepstakes casinos. On the other, they are focusing on prediction markets. In both cases, officials argue these platforms mimic gambling while avoiding oversight, taxation, and consumer protections.

Supporters emphasize the urgency of closing loopholes. They also warn that gray-market operators undermine regulated industries. Consequently, committees moved the bills forward to strengthen enforcement and clarify legal definitions.

SF 4474 Aims to Address Sweepstakes Casinos

SF 4474, introduced by Sen. Rasmusson, targets sweepstakes casinos. These platforms rely on a dual-currency system, often known as the "Gold Coin/Sweeps Coin" model.

In this setup, users purchase virtual currency for entertainment play. However, that purchase also grants eligibility for real-world prizes through a secondary currency. Lawmakers argue this structure effectively disguises real-money gambling.

Therefore, the bill seeks to redefine these systems as illegal. It specifically targets any model where a purchase tied to simulated gameplay enables prize redemption. As a result, most sweepstakes casino operators would be prohibited in Minnesota.

Notably, SF 4474 is paired with its House companion, HF 4410, which mirrors the same objective.

HF 4437 Targets Prediction Markets

Meanwhile, HF 4437, introduced by Rep. Greenman, focuses on prediction markets. These platforms allow users to wager on outcomes such as sports, elections, or economic events.

Lawmakers argue these offerings function like unlicensed sportsbooks. Therefore, the bill aims to classify many event-based contracts as illegal gambling activities.

Importantly, HF 4437 carries significant enforcement weight. The proposal would elevate the operation or promotion of such platforms to a felony offense.

Additionally, the bill has a Senate companion, SF 4511, which advances the same restrictions. Together, they create a unified effort to eliminate prediction-based wagering models.

Next Steps for the Bills

Both legislative tracks must pass additional committee reviews before reaching floor votes. Each chamber must then approve matching versions of their respective bills.

If differences emerge, conference committees will reconcile them. Lawmakers would then send finalized versions to the governor for approval or veto.

Potential Impact on Minnesota Gambling

If enacted, these measures would significantly reshape Minnesota gambling. Sweepstakes casinos would likely exit the state due to the ban on dual-currency systems.

At the same time, prediction markets could disappear under the threat of felony penalties. This would mark one of the strictest enforcement approaches in the country.

As a result, regulated operators could gain a stronger foothold. Licensed casinos and potential US online sportsbooks would face less competition from gray-market platforms.

Moreover, Minnesota's actions could influence other states. Lawmakers nationwide are increasingly examining similar models. Ultimately, these bills may accelerate a broader crackdown on alternative wagering formats across the US.

Jonathan Rodriguez
Jonathan Rodriguez

Jonathan is an avid basketball fan, and is often looking forward to the next upcoming NBA season when not checking players' stats during games. He also likes to keep his ears on the ground for the latest rumblings in the online casino industry.

This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only. Betting News makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information given or the outcome of any game or event.